This site may earn affiliate commissions from the links on this page. Terms of use.

Nosotros don't talk much about graphene these days. Later a furious round of excitement and research half a decade ago, the topic has largely cooled off. Part of the reason why is because information technology proved incredibly difficult to industry in quantities that were useful. Inquiry into the material has been slow and fitful, and a grouping of scientists that examined the stuff actually existence sold as graphene thinks it knows why: Much of it isn't.

According to a new paper published in the periodical Advanced Materials, researchers who analyzed graphene bachelor from 60 different producers found that none of it contained more than than 50 percentage graphene. This is a serious issue for anyone attempting to research the properties of the textile. Graphene has the incredibly electrical connectivity it does because it'due south a single layer of carbon atoms. When you start stacking multiple layers on top of each other, what you have isn't graphene anymore. It's graphite.

Liquid-Phase

The authors focused on graphene produced via Liquid Phase Exfoliation (LPE) rather than graphene produced by the original adhesive tape method, as using Scotch record to pull graphene sheets off graphite blocks isn't a technique that tin be scaled up to mass production. But the findings point that the consummate lack of a formal standard for what characteristics graphene should possess, too as a lack of sub-standard classification for specific applications has led to a situation in which most of what'due south being sold isn't graphene at all. And that might explain why companies have had so petty luck working with it, because what they're actually buying isn't the material they recollect it is.

Graphene-Content

Graphene'due south performance is sensitive to contamination, and virtually of the samples the researchers tested were contaminated too. Graphite and graphene have very different operation backdrop, and scattering a moderate corporeality of the old into the latter — something that you can't run into with your naked eye — is a slap-up way to ruin the performance of the graphene. The authors' write:

Furthermore, it is worrisome that producers are labeling black powders as graphene and selling for height dollar, while in reality they incorporate mostly cheap graphite. This kind of activity gives a bad reputation to the whole industry and has a negative impact on serious developers of graphene applications. Only through standardization and following protocols for characterization as proposed here, the graphene industry can evolve reliably.

They notation that in the instance of graphene contaminated with metals, the metallic particles would interfere with the operation of graphene electrodes in any battery. The final conclusion of the authors is that: "there is well-nigh no high-quality graphene, as defined by ISO, in the marketplace nevertheless. The lack of properly characterized, high-quality material has been stalling the evolution of applications that depend fundamentally on graphene such as avant-garde coatings and composites, high-performance batteries and supercapacitors, etc."

It'south not clear if this will actually pb to more than employ of graphene — graphene remains uncommonly difficult to manufacture and that solitary could prevent it from moving out of the research lab. But given that researchers plainly won't know if information technology has benefits if the fabric they think they're evaluating isn't actually graphene, finding a way to hold companies to a rigorous standard is the only fashion to articulate the runway for actual evaluations. The authors call for the creation of production standards that can be used to quantify and accurately describe the dissimilar types of graphene that companies create, besides as for ameliorate quality control to ensure the final production is what it says it is.

Now Read: New Graphene Discovery Could Finally Punch the Gas Pedal, Drive Faster CPUs, New Method for Growing Graphene Could Finally Allow Us Build Something With It, and Motility Over Graphene: IBM Expects Copper Interconnects to Hold the CMOS Line